Optothermal revolution – preprint

We have an Arxiv preprint on how a mixture of colloids (thermally active + passive particles in water) can lead to the emergence of revolution dynamics in an optical ring trap (dotted line). Super effort by our lab members Rahul Chand and Ashutosh Shukla.

Interestingly, the revolution emerges only when an active and a passive colloid are combined (not as individuals) in a ring potential (dotted line)

the direction (clock or anti-clockwise) of the revolution depends on the relative placement of the colloids in the trap

This revolution can be further used to propel a third active colloid

There are many more details in the paper. Check it out: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.16792

Election in Pune and Zero shadow day

Today is election day in Pune (Lok Sabha), and I voted.

Today is also a ‘zero shadow day’ in Pune. The sun is exactly over our head (zenith), and no angle is subtended by the shadow. In the pic, the sun is captured at its zenith.

Caution: don’t look at the sun directly. This image was captured wearing filtered glass

Check the webpage of the Astronomical Society of India linked below. It has some good explanations and geographical locations in India where zero shadow day is observed.

Music beats on a metal water can

If you have a metal water can, what do you do ?…well make a geeky music video🙂

I played the water can to generate beats & recorded the response.

You will see the periodic beats + colour-coded audio-visualisation. 📹

Enjoy !

#fun #experiment

A metal water can was played to generate music beats, and the acoustic response was recorded. You will see the periodic beats in the timeline and a colour-coded audio-visualisation of it. Enjoy !

Graviton modes in solids: Old Argentinian wine in new Bottle ?

Recently, there has been a buzz about a Nature paper titled Evidence for chiral graviton modes in fractional quantum Hall liquids. There has been some media reportage on the paper too.

The paper makes interesting claim on observation of ‘chiral graviton modes’ in certain ultra-cooled semiconductors (Gallium Arsenide – famously called GaAs). The cooled temperature is quite low (~50 mK), which is impressive, and the chirality of the mode is unveiled using polarization-resolved Raman scattering. The observation of this so-called ‘Graviton modes’ is essentially a quasiparticle excitation, and has created some buzz. In my opinion, graviton-like behavior is a bit of an exaggeration.

Anyway, this paper has set an interesting discussion among my colleagues (condensed matter and high energy physics) in our department. To add to their discussion, I wrote on 2 points (and an inference) from optics perspective, which I am sharing below :

  1. The measurement scheme used to unveil the chirality of the quasi-particles is a well-known trick in polarization optics. In fact, I teach it to our undergrads. Notice the use of quarter-wave plates (indicated by the arrow in the figure below). This is also the measurement at the heart of unveiling optical anisotropy. Experimentally, what is impressive is the ultra-low energy excitation captured via Raman scattering. This is again thanks to the excellent cooling of the sample (50 mK).
Figure from the Nature paper.

2. The last author of this paper, Aron Pinczuk, was a well-known expert in light scattering in solids. He was an Argentinian-American professor at Columbia University, and passed away in 2022.

Aron Pinczuk

He and the legendary Manuel Cardona were instrumental (pun intended) in laying the foundation for using inelastic light scattering methods in solids. The first edition of the series “Light Scattering in Solids”, written in 1976, has Pincuk discussing the very measurement scheme used in the paper (see picture).  

The first edition (1976) of a great series : Light Scattering in Solids

My initial inference on the paper : This is an old Argentinan wine of quasiparticles in a new GaAs bottle at ultra-low temperature….and NATURE is selling it as champagne de graviton made in China ! 

Earliest painting of a person wearing spectacles

The Italian painter Tomaso Barisini da Modena (1325-1379) was one of the first to depict a person wearing a spectacle. The above painting dates back to 1352.

There has been a bit of debate on the first painting to have a person wearing spectacle as discussed in the below reference. The history of spectacles itself is interesting, and their origins is also hotly debated among historians of science.

To give you a flavor of the debate, let me quote E. Rosen, “The Invention of Eyeglasses,” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 1 1 (1956), p.13. :

“Much has been written, ranging from the valuable to the worthless, about the invention of eyeglasses; but when it is all summed up, the fact remains that the world has found lenses on its nose without knowing whom to thank.”

Similarly, the origins of telescope are also under debate [1]:

“if victory has a thousand fathers, as it is commonly said, then the invention of spectacles and of its derivative, the telescope (another nominee listed among the top inventions of the last two millennia), must have just as many.”

[1] Ilardi, Vincent. 2007. Renaissance Vision from Spectacles to Telescopes. Philadelphia, PA : American Philosophical Society. http://archive.org/details/bub_gb_peIL7hVQUmwC.

Electron Microscopy and Optical Holography: some notes from history

Since the 16th century CE, improving the limits of optical resolution has become an essential technical goal in optics research, and it continues to challenge us even today. When they were introduced, optical microscopes opened a new world for humans to observe, learn and eventually control matter at microscopic scales. A logical progression in this thought was to extend the resolution limit to the atomic scales unavailable to optical microscopes. Enter the ‘electron’ microscope. They changed the game entirely and paved the way to visualize matter at the atomic scale.

Electron microscopes were invented in the 1930s. When they were built in some laboratories, there was considerable public interest in understanding these “advanced” tools, as witnessed by a short but interesting article in the September 1940 edition of Popular Mechanics.

Sept 1940: Above is an image and description of one of the earliest electron microscopes published in Popular Mechanics

Reference: Popular Mechanics ~ 1940. n.d. Accessed January 7, 2024. http://archive.org/details/PopularMechanics1940.

The article speculates

First applications of the electron microscope are expected to be in biological and industrial research.

This is interesting because electron microscopes were still in their infancy, and the working principles were explored for better quality images and sample durability.

The origins of the electron microscope have an interesting history and were inspired by optics (for an interesting commentary, see Freundlich, Martin M. 1963. “Origin of the Electron Microscope.” Science 142 (3589): 185–88. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1712183). The first demonstration of a working microscope was by Ruska and Knoll (Z. Tech. Phys., 12 (1931)), and the conceptual foundations date back to the late 1890s. Ruska was eventually awarded a Nobel prize for his work on electron optics and the invention of the electron microscope in 1986.

As with any development in science and technology, an idea becomes a seed to another idea. In the case of electron microscopy, it led to some early motivations behind the invention of optical holography by Dennis Gabor, which eventually fetched him a Nobel Prize in 1970.

Dennis Gabor was also inspired and interested by the invention of electron microscopes. He played a critical role in formulating the problem of resolution limit, which further led to the invention of holography. To quote his Nobel lecture :

Let us now jump a century and a half, to 1947. At that time I was very
interested in electron microscopy. This wonderful instrument had at that time
produced a hundredfold improvement on the resolving power of the best light
microscopes, and yet it was disappointing, because it had stopped short of resolving atomic lattices. The de Broglie wavelength of fast electrons, about
l/20 Ångström, was short enough, but the optics was imperfect. The best
electron objective which one can make can be compared in optical perfection
to a raindrop than to a microscope objective, and through the theoretical
work of O. Scherzer it was known that it could never be perfected.

Interestingly, Gabor started his work in Germany but had to move out of the country due to the political situation. As he mentions in his biographical note :

In 1933, when Hitler came to power, I left Germany and after a short period in Hungary went to England. At that time, in 1934, England was still in the depths of the depression, and jobs for foreigners were very difficult. I obtained employment with the British Thomson-Houston Co., Rugby, on an inventor’s agreement. The invention was a gas discharge tube with a positive characteristic, which could be operated on the mains.

He stayed back in England and continued his work. The important aspect is that the development of electron microscopy eventually led to some fundamental experiments in optical holography. To quote Gabor’s biographical note :

The years after the war were the most fruitful. I wrote, among many others, my first papers on communication theory, I developed a system of stereoscopic cinematography, and in the last year, 1948 I carried out the basic experiments in holography, at that time called “wavefront reconstruction”. This again was an exercise in serendipity. The original objective was an improved electron microscope, capable of resolving atomic lattices and seeing single atoms. Three year’s work, 1950-53, carried out in collaboration with the AEI Research Laboratory in Aldermaston, led to some respectable results, but still far from the goal. We had started 20 years too early. 

The general notion in optics is that experiments in the visible light frequencies led to developments in electron microscopy. In the case of optical holography, at least in the initial stages of its invention, electron microscopy played a critical role. Developments in electron optics led to some fundamental questions in optical wavefront reconstruction. This further led to optical holography.

This reminds me of a quote attributed to Buckminster :

How often I found where I should be going only by setting out for somewhere else.