Namaste, Hola & Welcome from G.V. Pavan Kumar.
I am a Professor of Physics at the Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, India.
My research interests are :
(1) Optics & Soft Matter: Optically Induced Forces – Assembly, Dynamics & Function;
(2) History and Philosophy of Science – Ideas in Physical Sciences.
I am interested in the historical and philosophical evolution of ideas and tools in the physical sciences and technology. I research the intellectual history of past scientists, innovators, and people driven by curiosity, and I write about them from an Indian and Asian perspective. My motivation is to humanize science.
In the same spirit, I write and host my podcast Pratidhvani – Humanizing Science.
He is also bi-lingual author (non-fiction+fiction)
We discuss
his bio, growing up in Assam, career trajectory in India & US, his research, books, writing process ++
his current research interest in cosmology especially related to diffuse gases and deliberated on some contemporary questions.
on a variety of books he has authored and what motivated him to write in Bengali and English. What has been his experience in communicating science in two different languages.
Maxwell’s equation as per Heaviside formulation. Image courtesy Wikipedia.
I have been teaching Optics course this semester, and in order to introduce wave theory of light, I had to use Maxwell’s equation. In there, I mentioned that the expression for Maxwell’s equation that we use now is mainly thanks to the formulation of Oliver Heaviside.
Born in 1850, Heaviside grew up in poverty and had physical illness in his childhood.
Oliver Heaviside had an unusual life. He did not have a formal education in science or engineering, but contributed immensely to what is now called as classical electromagnetism.
He was nephew of Wheatstone (of the fame of Wheatstone network), who helped him to find a job in a telegraph company, which was in 1870s, a booming industry.
Heaviside showed a lot of promise in his work, and learnt a lot on the go.
Around 1872, at the age of 22, he published his first research paper in Philosophical Magazine, which caught the attention of people such as Lord Kelvin and James Maxwell.
At the age of 24, Heaviside quit his job (because of various reasons including ill health), and went back to live with his parents.
Around 1873, Maxwell’s treatise on Electricity and Magnetism was published, and this mesmerized Heaviside.
He studied it with dedication, but could not understand it. Therefore, he decided to re-write Maxwell’s treatise.
Maxwell had used quaternion, which was a number system devised by Hamilton.
This formulation was cumbersome, and was not easy to understand especially in the context of electricity and magnetism.
Heaviside took this formulation, and re-casted it in terms of vector calculus.
Interestingly, Gibbs had also done the same (earlier than Heaviside), but had not published his results.
Nevertheless, both Heaviside and Gibbs pushed this formulation further, and eventually the research community saw its utility.
There are many contributions of Heaviside towards electromagnetism, and inductive loading was one of them. Initially, this loading method of introducing repeated coils along the cable was met with a lot of opposition. But eventually, the advantage was realized and Oliver (and his brother, who initiated the work) were vindicated.
Heaviside was a prolific researcher, and published 3 volumes on electromagnetic theory, in addition to various research papers.
He also wrote a column spanning over 20 years in a magazine named TheElectrician.
After 1914 or so, Heaviside’s could not work due to ill health and paranoia, which disturbed his mind.
In 1925, Oliver Heaviside passed away.
There are some excellent books and biographical notes on Heaviside. Below are a few :
Hunt, Bruce J. The Maxwellians. Cornell University Press, 1994.
Hunt, Bruce J. “Oliver Heaviside: A First-Rate Oddity.” Physics Today 65, no. 11 (November 1, 2012): 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.1788.
Nahin, Paul J. Oliver Heaviside: The Life, Work, and Times of an Electrical Genius of the Victorian Age. Second Edition. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002.
Among the books and discussion on this topic, I found this book by science historian Bruce Hunt to be very interesting. He identifies 3 plus 1 people who extensively developed Maxwell’s electromagnetic theory and presented in a way that the world could understand its significance. They were G. F. FitzGerald, Oliver Heaviside, Oliver Lodge and to a certain extent – Heinrich Hertz.
The foreword of this excellent book was written by a well known historian of science L. Peerce Williams and he sums the situation in which the theory was developed :
“Like Newton’s Principia, Maxwell’s Treatise did not immediately convince the scientific community. The concepts in it were strange and the mathematics was clumsy and involved. Most of the experimental basis was drawn from the researches of Michael Faraday, whose results were undeniable, but whose ideas seemed bizarre to the orthodox physicist. The British had, more or less, become accustomed to Faraday’s “vision,” but continental physicists, while accepting the new facts that poured from his laboratory, rejected his conceptual structures. One of Maxwell’s purposes in writing his treatise was to put Faraday’s ideas into the language of mathematical physics precisely so that orthodox physicists would be persuaded of their importance. Maxwell died in 1879, midway through preparing a second edition of the Treatise. At that time, he had convinced only a very few of his fellow countrymen and none of his continental colleagues. That task now fell to his disciples.
The story that Bruce Hunt tells in this volume is the story of the ways in which Maxwell’s ideas were picked up in Great Britain, modified, organized, and reworked mathematically so that the Treatise as a whole and Maxwell’s concepts were clarified and made palatable, indeed irresistible, to the physicists of the late nineteenth century. The men who accomplished this, G. F. FitzGerald, Oliver Heaviside, Oliver Lodge, and others, make up the group that Hunt calls the “Maxwellians.” Their relations with one another and with Maxwell’s works make for a fascinating study of the ways in which new and revolutionary scientific ideas move from the periphery of scientific thought to the very center. In the process, Professor Hunt also, by extensive use of manuscript sources, examines the genesis of some of the more important ideas that fed into and led to the scientific revolution of the twentieth century.“
I found the discussion in this podcast interesting. Austin Kleon is charting out some interesting intellectual territory, and his work and thoughts are worth following. I have read most of his books and seen his talks, and it resonates with combinatoric creativity that Maria Popova often writes about.
Will Durant is quoted to have said – “nothing is new, except the arrangement”
Arindam Ghosh is a Professor at the Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science. He did his PhD at the Indian Institute of Science on probing metal-insulator transition and Coulomb interaction effect in doped semiconductors in 2000, following which he worked in Cambridge University, UK, as a post doctoral researcher. His current research interests include the transport properties of two-dimensional electronic systems in semiconductors, carbon-based low-dimensional systems, optoelectronic properties of atomically-thin semiconductor membranes, magnetic nanostructures, and structural stability of nanoscale systems such as metallic nanowires and nanoparticles. The technical expertise of his research group lies in detection and measurement of ultra-low level electrical signals, and wideband “noise” measurements down to milli-Kelvin temperatures.
In this episode we discussed :
his biography – how he became an experimental physicist
his career trajectory and his research experiences
his current interests in quantum technology and quantum materials
specific aspects of his research over the years
thoughts on Indian science and technology and related policy
“Quantum Materials and Devices Group – Department of Physics – IISc – Bangalore India.” Accessed September 3, 2023. http://www.physics.iisc.ac.in/~arindam/.
Santhanam is a physicist and a professor in dept. of physics at Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune
He is a theoretical physicist, and his research interest include a variety of topics including chaos and nonlinear dynamics, quantum chaos, quantum computation and machine learning, statistical physics, complex networks, extreme events and complex systems.
In this episode we discussed
his biography
on how he developed interest in physics
his experience of studying at Hyderabad university
the ecosystem of the university
he also tells us about his experience on learning and doing research in Quantum classical correspondence, extreme event, data analysis leading to maching learning, nonlinear dynamics and complex systems
We discussed importance of physics and it role in society and how academics can contribute towards betterment of society
There is also an excellent segment in Tamil, in which Santhanam describes his research with an interesting analogy.
We also discussed about his interest in writing about science-society interface, and about politics
Santhanam wonderfully combines intuitive thinking of physics, with computation approaches to study many interesting problems in complex systems, and he elaborates on this aspect with excellent clarity
Santhanam and I work in the same department, and I have always found discussion with him both illuminating and interesting. I continue to learn a lot from him.
Pal, Ritam, Aanjaneya Kumar, and M. S. Santhanam. “Depolarization of Opinions on Social Networks through Random Nudges.” arXiv, February 24, 2023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.06920.
Santhanam, M. S., Sanku Paul, and J. Bharathi Kannan. “Quantum Kicked Rotor and Its Variants: Chaos, Localization and Beyond.” Physics Reports, Quantum kicked rotor and its variants: Chaos, localization and beyond, 956 (April 22, 2022): 1–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2022.01.002.